[HamWAN PSDR] Cell Sites on DNR Towers
John D. Hays
john at hays.org
Tue Oct 19 08:35:13 PDT 2021
About 10 years ago, DNR was going to start charging amateur repeaters
commercial rates to use DNR sites. I recall there was an active
information campaign to the legislature and the legislature instructed DNR
to maintain the amateur radio rates. I recall ARRL was involved as well.
What has been done with your legislators and the Governor's office to see
what they are willing to do?
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:05 PM Jamie Owens <jlowens76 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe also throw in HamWAN Cam's helped catch a wildfire early on.
> Sad things like this go un-noticed/recognized
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:19 PM Dale Skyllingstad <
> dskyllingstad at harbornet.com> wrote:
>> This is very unfortunate news. Perhaps we can draft a letter to our
>> state legislators explaining our situation with the DNR, and detailing our
>> network's contribution toward state emergency communications. Maybe even
>> including an example of our wildfire report last year?
>> On 10/18/2021 10:07 PM, Nigel Vander Houwen wrote:
>> Hello HamWAN volunteers/users/interested parties,
>> As has been previously discussed on the list, there has been a lot of
>> happenings in the background over roughly the last year with regards to DNR
>> sites. We’ve had several sites in limbo for some time as lease holders
>> worked with DNR to sort things out, and we had some hopeful indications
>> that it would end up working out in the end.
>> Unfortunately indications have greatly soured. As discussed in recent
>> weeks, Rattlesnake and Larch Mountain were decommissioned recently, and
>> we’ve now received official word that we’ll need to decommission Gold
>> Mountain in the coming weeks. As much as I’d like it to end there, we are
>> not holding our breath for Capitol Peak or Blyn.
>> Unfortunately new rules DNR has placed on amateur leases effectively
>> exclude use cases like HamWAN, if they were offering them at all due to DNR
>> budget issues, and commercial rates are simply not feasible. I’m sure folks
>> will think/suggest about additional donations to cover it, but commercial
>> rates would require many-fold our current donation levels EVERY YEAR to
>> make work. It’s simply not something we can reasonably consider.
>> I’m very sorry to have to deliver this news to the many folks this will
>> impact. This is obviously a major blow for the network. I’m thankful for
>> the team who has put so much effort into building out these sites and
>> maintaining the infrastructure, and I’m saddened to see that work torn
>> down. Likewise I know there are quite a number of combined users,
>> repeaters, and emergency groups who are going to be impacted by this. I
>> hope that we can work with you to get you connected to another site where
>> the pathing works.
>> We’re not done. There’s a lot of the core network, and a lot of coverage
>> that doesn’t rely on these DNR sites, and will remain operational. We’ll
>> likely need to do some work to reconsider/rework redundant pathing after
>> this loss. Going forward I’m hopeful for finding new non-DNR sites where we
>> can rebuild and expand once more.
>> If anyone has any specific notes or suggestions, please send us an email
>> at netops at hamwan.org
>> PSDR mailing listPSDR at hamwan.orghttp://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>> PSDR mailing list
>> PSDR at hamwan.org
> Jamie Owens
> PSDR mailing list
> PSDR at hamwan.org
John D. Hays
K7VE / WRJT-215
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the PSDR